|
PROPOSAL FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES 6
AND 9 OF THE ROME CONVENTION OF 19 JUNE 1980 ON THE LAW APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the context of the reformulation of
the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations of
19 June 1980 in a Community legislative act,
I. Article 6 (2) (a) of the Convention
is replaced by the following text:
“2. Notwithstanding the provisions
of Article 4, a contract of employment shall, in the absence of choice
in accordance with Article 3, be governed:
(a) by the law of the country in
which the employee habitually carries out his work in performance
of the contract. The place where the work is habitually carried out
is not to be regarded as having changed if the employee is posted
for a limited period to work in another country. The conclusion of
a contract of employment with an employer belonging to the same group
as the original employer shall not exclude a finding that such a posting
has taken place.”
II. Article 6 of the Convention is supplemented
by an additional paragraph, paragraph 3, as follows:
“3. The foregoing provisions
are without prejudice to the application of the mandatory rules of the
law of the country to which the employee is posted as provided for by
Directive 96/71 of 16 December, 1996, concerning the posting of workers
in the framework of the provision of services.”
III. Article 9 of the Convention is amended
as follows:
Paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the
following paragraph:
“1. A contract is formally valid
if it satisfies the formal requirements of the law which governs it
under [this convention] or of the law of the country where either of
the parties is present at the time of the conclusion of the contract
or of the law of the country in which either party is habitually resident
at that time.”
Paragraph 3 becomes paragraph 2 and the
expression “paragraphs 1 and 2” is replaced by the expression
“paragraph 1.”
Paragraph 4 becomes paragraph 3 as follows:
“3. An act intended to have legal
effect relating to an existing or contemplated contract is formally
valid if it satisfies the formal requirements of the law which under
[this Convention] governs or would govern the contract or of the law
of the country in which the act was done or of the law of the country
in which the person who effected the act was habitually resident.”
Paragraph 5 is removed.
Paragraph 6 becomes paragraph 4 and the
expression “Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 to 4” is replaced
by the expression “Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 to 3.”
|